Skip to content

Chapter One: Providence?

April 22, 2011

Mordecai’s challenge to Esther (Esther 4:14) was far from convincing. “Who knows,” he questioned. “Perhaps it was for a time and place such as this that God has put you where you are.” Yet, Esther knew that Mordecai was asking her to put her life on the line on the chance that God Himself had arranged her meeting with destiny. Esther’s story is the tale of the courageous gamble which paid off well – faith rewarded with the words, “happily ever after…” Our look into the life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer forces our consideration of faith deeper into Hebrews 11 than we normally tend to venture. Usually, we play happily in the fields of the great faith chapter until we get to the middle of verse 35, where the drastic change of tone is so abrupt and severe that it knocks us senseless. Right in the middle of that verse the rewards for great faith and obedience move from wonderful to horrific – torture, jeers, flogging, several kinds of death! How can this be the reward for faith?
The first chapter of the Metaxas text is far more than literary puffery or simple background on the subject at hand. Metaxas is raising the curtains and revealing the stage that will provide the backdrop for our journey through Bonhoeffer’s life. Among the greatest questions set forth for our consideration is the idea of providence. Bonhoeffer’s lineage, time of birth, intellect, courage, faith, ethic – almost everything about the man, point like a rifle scope on the target that was Adolf Hitler. In the end, it was not Bonhoeffer’s decision regarding Hitler that finishes the story. Rather, it is the life of a man and his legacy that makes Bonhoeffer so intriguing. What’s more – no consideration of the providential hand of God in another person’s life leaves us untouched. It is something like a funeral, where our attention on the other’s obvious mortality is overwhelming interrupted by the consideration of our own. Has God placed you or I where we are, here and now? Bonhoeffer’s friend, Peter Olden, recalled that he was surprised by Dietrich that anyone could be so aware of “exactly where he stood.”
Be challenged.
Some things to consider as you look through Chapter one:
• Bonhoeffer is shown even at an early age as a protector. We will discuss the rival concepts of warrior-protector vs. warrior-conqueror during the seminar.
• Bonhoeffer’s family culture is described as seeking selflessness, generosity, and helping others. He seemed to be a lifelong advocate and example of these ideals. Does this fit our idea of the kind of person who would ultimately be hung for attempted murder?
• Two other themes emerge: simplicity and truthfulness.
• The Bonhoeffer family was decidedly anti-stupid.
• Our first strong challenge to “cheap grace” is presented. Do you see Dietrich’s response?
Blessings!

4 Comments leave one →
  1. Bonhoefferfan permalink
    May 9, 2011 11:53 pm

    It seems like Bonhoeffer was the perfect person to be brought up to stand against Hitler. Since didn’t actually bring Hitler down I wonder what the point was? Mordecai said maybe. Maybe we just to try our best and see if God wants to bless it. Maybe Bonhoeffers best thing was his example.

  2. Tracy permalink
    May 18, 2011 10:51 pm

    Reading about this kind of upbringing makes me feel inadequate as a parent. I love the family musical Saturdays and the closeness evident in this chapter.

    I was especially intrigued by the passage on Martin Luther and his shaping of the German language and nation through his Bible translation.

  3. Bonhoefferfan permalink
    May 19, 2011 9:48 am

    It was a different time and a different world. I was raised more by the television than I was by my parents. I think part of the reason Bonhoeffer found his calling so early in life is because of the intentionality his parents had toward their kids.

  4. June 30, 2011 10:56 am

    Providence is a funny thing. How are we to know exactly when we are being provided a certain circumstance, opportunity, thought, etc?

    Abraham was asked to take the life of his son. I have never felt that I fully understand all that happened, but I have always seen the ram as a glorious example of God’s providence. Even as I write this, I find myself wondering why God would even ask this murderous obedience of the eventual father of his chosen people. What was the point? To prove Abraham’s obedience or give us an example of his providence? I think both.

    This leads me to conclude that God’s desire for us is unquestioning obedience. Is this obedience part of recognizing and affirming that grace (providence, perhaps) did not come cheap? Are we supposed to be able to align what we know of God with what we feel He is calling us to do? Did Abraham?

    Does God’s overall goal for our lives always go in a straight path or does He sometimes require us, in blind obedience, to go backwards and sideways and do things that just don’t make sense in order that we be moved into a direct alignment that will allow us to strike for His purpose with more precision?

    I believe that DB was being obedient to what he was convicted to do. My question now is, was the failed assassination actually God’s providence protecting DB from committing an act that would have somehow “un-sanctified” this now martyr? Did his failure and therefore ultimately his death act as a catalyst for the end of the war and ill-conceived perceptions of all the Germans?

    *I am in no was saying that it was God’s will for the holocaust or any of the atrocities committed at the hand of the Third Reich to occur.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.